Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 N.Y.2d 493

People v. Dash

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1965

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1965-04-22

Cited by 14 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1970

11 federal appellate ·

Relies on Jackson v. Denno

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-04-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Memorandum : We hold that nothing in Jackson v. Denno (378 U. S. 368) or People v. Huntley (15 N Y 2d 72) requires this court to overrule our decision in People v. Nicholson (11 N Y 2d 1067) whose holding and reasoning we now approve. (See People v. Rogers, 15 N Y 2d 690.) The defendant, therefore, is not now entitled to a hearing before the trial court on the issue of the voluntariness of his confession. Nor has any argument been advanced to justify or warrant any change or modification of our conclusion, in People v. Howard (12 N Y 2d 65, 68-69), that retroactive effect is not to be accorded to decisions of this court respecting right to counsel. (See, also, People v. Rogers, 15 N Y 2d 690, supra.)

¶2We also hold that the defendant has not presented a triable issue on the question of coercion.

¶3The orders appealed from should be affirmed.

¶4Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan concur in Memorandum ; Chief Judge Desmond and Judge Fuld dissent and vote to remand for a hearing since the petition raises a triable issue of fact as to whether the guilty plea was *495induced by coercion (People v. Picciotti, 4 N Y 2d 340; People v. Pearson, 12 N Y 2d 978; People v. Lake, 14 N Y 2d 790; People v. Zilliner, 14 N Y 2d 834).

¶5Orders affirmed.

/16/ny2d/493 · .json · Public domain