Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Ohio App. 3d 1 - Lyle v. Durham

16 Ohio App. 3d 1 - Lyle v. Durham’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
6
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably 90 Ohio App. 3d 400 - Wozniak v. Wozniak (1993), Heiman v. Parrish (1997)

33 state decisions

13019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cincinnati Insurance v. First National Bank · Gaden v. Gaden · Albanese v. Indelicato · 111 Ohio St. 361 - Cincinnati Finance Co. v. Booth · 61 Ohio App. 452 - Morris v. Pearl St. Auction Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plaintiff's suit was in conversion, and the trial court awarded plaintiff interest from the time of the filing of the complaint. The general rule in conversion actions is that the plaintiff is awarded interest from an even earlier point, the time of conversion. Booth v. Cincinnati Finance Co. (1923), 19 Ohio App. 130 , affirmed (1924), 111 Ohio St. 361 ; Morris v. Pearl Street Auction Co. (1939), 61 Ohio App. 452 [ 15 O.O. 283 ]. The trial court made no error prejudicial to defendant, and did not abuse its discretion, in choosing the filing of the complaint as the time from which to calculate the interest. Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. First Natl. Bank of Akron (1980), 63 Ohio St.2d 220 , 226.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * [O]ne or both of the parties merely changes his mind about the desirability of the other as a marriage partner * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Rights in Respect of Engagement and Courtship Presents When Marriage Does Not Ensue,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.