16 Ohio App. 3d 227 - Turoff v. Stefanac’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2024
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on University of Texas v. Camenisch · Pughsley v. 3750 Lake Shore Drive Cooperative Building · Levas and Levas v. Village of Antioch Illinois · Nationwide Amusements, Inc. v. Nattin · Wohlfahrt v. Memorial Medical Center
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here is no provision that allows a court to consolidate a hearing on the merits with an application for a temporary restraining order. However, when all of the parties had notice of, were present at, and participated in the hearing, the court may treat the application for a temporary restraining order as one for a preliminary injunction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Before consolidation, the parties should normally receive clear and unambiguous notice of the court's intent to consolidate the trial and the hearing either before the hearing commences or at a time which will still afford the parties a full opportunity to present their respective cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.