Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Ohio App. 3d 336 - Salamon v. Taft Broadcasting Co.

16 Ohio App. 3d 336 - Salamon v. Taft Broadcasting Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably 62 Ohio App. 3d 110 - Asmaro v. Jefferson Ins. Co. of New York (1989), 93 Ohio App. 3d 449 - Gallagher v. Cleveland Browns Football Co., Inc. (1994)

38 state decisions

11019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 32 Ohio App. 2d 36 - DeVore v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. · The Schooner Argyle v. Worthington · 56 Ohio App. 366 - Marx v. Scott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) Claims for Relief. A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief *** Shall contain (1) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and (2) a demand for judgment for the relief to which he deems himself entitled. Relief in the alternative or of several different types may be demanded.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “simply requires that a claim or defense concisely set forth only those operative facts sufficient to give”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “fair notice of the nature of the action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.