16 Ohio App. 3d 432 - Slusher v. Oeder’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc. · Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America · Paugh v. Hanks · Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co. · Reamsnyder v. Jaskolski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Clearly, had Oeder directly and personally confronted Slusher and made his threats, demands and intentions known to Slusher, such would be a sufficient basis for bringing an action for the intentional infliction of emotional distress provided Slusher could prove the requisite degree of conduct on the part of Oeder and that the emotional distress suffered as a result of Oeder’s actions was serious. However, even if Oeder purposely avoided any direct and personal confrontation with Slusher, his actions of making continuous and repeated advances towards Mrs. Slusher indicate a conscious disregard on his part of the high degree of probability that mental distress could follow from his conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““No person shall be liable in civil damages for any breach of a promise to marry, alienation of affections, or criminal conversation * * *.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.