Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 OR 127 - Chrisman v. Cherisman

Chrisman v. Cherisman’s Empirical Analysis

1888

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
July 1957
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 1957 · most notably Holman's Will (1902), Ames v. Ames (1902)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 26 state decisions

9018881890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Delafield v. . Parish · Jackson v. Hardin · McMechen v. McMechen · Comstock v. Hadlyme Ecclesiastical Society · Rigg v. Wilton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The phrase “sound mind,” ’ said Sir James Hanner, ‘covers the whole subject, but emphasis is laid upon two particular functions of mind which must be sound in order to create capacity for the making of a will, for there must be memory to recall the several persons who may be supposed to be in such a position as to become the fitting objects of the testator’s bounty; above all, there must be understanding to comprehend their relations to himself, and their claims upon him.’ (Broughton v. Knight, Law R. 3 Pro. & D. 64; 6 Moak E.R. 350.) This probably is about as correct a definition of the law as any given, but it is merely a reiteration in a different phrase of what has been repeatedly expressed by other judges. * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.