16 Or. App. 560 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

35 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “At least as much specificity should be required in a pretrial objection to the admissibility of evidence, i. e., a motion to suppress, as is required in an oral objection made during the course of a trial. In fact, even more specificity could reasonably be required because the pretrial objection can be researched and written under relatively calm circumstances, as distinguished from an extemporaneous objection made in the heat of trial. [Id. 519 P.2d at 1057-58.]”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Lee · State v. Carter

2. “The difficulty which arises in determining the facts in cases of this character could, for the most part, be eliminated if the trial judge would make findings of fact on all contested evidence underlying his ruling upon the reasonableness of a seizure in a given case”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Magee

3. “where a motion to suppress raises more than one contention . . . and the trial court is persuaded to grant the motion on one or more of the grounds raised, then the trial court must state the basis of its decision.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 89 Wash. 2d 416 - State v. Agee