People v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Nathan DUNLAP, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. (2007), People v. Collins (2010)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · People v. Fuller · Carrillo v. People · Nailor v. People · People v. MacRander
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[N]Jo person summoned as a juror shall be disqualified by reason of a previously formed or expressed opinion with reference to the guilt or innocence of the accused, if the court is satisfied, from the examination of the juror or from other evidence, that he will render an impartial verdict according to the law and the evidence submitted to the jury at the trial.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[O]nly the trial court can assess accurately the juror's intent from the juror's tone of voice, facial expressions, and general demeanor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[D]enials of challenges for cause have been reversed where prospective jurors have made statements demonstrating bias and there are no other statements in the record that would permit the reviewing court to affirm based on deference to the trial court's assessment of unclear or ambiguous responses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Clemens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.