Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 So. 3d 1051 - Abbey v. Patrick

16 So. 3d 1051 - Abbey v. Patrick’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 436 So. 2d 93 - Combs v. State · 658 So. 2d 523 - Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggs · 509 So. 2d 1097 - Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage · 655 So. 2d 91 - Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston · 658 So. 2d 646 - Parkway Bank v. FORT MYERS ARMATURE WORK

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “justification for issuing a writ of certio-rari is diminished greatly if the parties have been afforded the essential process guaranteed by law and the judge has merely made a mistake in an order or ruling entered in the course of the proceeding. In that event, the relief afforded by an appeal from the final judgment will be adequate, and certiorari will not lie even if the error is one that amounts to a departure from the essential requirements of the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.