Hines v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 630 So. 2d 741 - Brown v. Drillers, Inc. · Moak v. American Automobile Insurance Company · 843 So. 2d 1049 - Burguieres v. Pollingue · 633 So. 2d 1210 - Kelty v. Brumfield · Ortego v. STATE, DOTD
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Except as otherwise provided by law, a valid and final judgment is conclusive between the same parties , except on appeal or other direct review, to the following extent ....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) mutual intention of preventing or putting an end to the litigation, and (2) reciprocal concessions of the parties to adjust their differences.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a party claiming res judicata based on a compromise agreement must have been a party to the compromise, and the authority of the thing adjudged extends only to the matters those parties intended to settle.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.