Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 So. 3d 229

Robinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 14, 2009

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-08-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2013

1 state decisions

Relies on Bolden v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-08-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*230 PER CURIAM.

¶1 Appellant challenges her conviction and sentence for armed burglary. We find no error as to the conviction but determine that there was insufficient evidence that appellant was in possession of a firearm during the burglary to support imposition of the mandatory minimum sentence under section 775.087, Florida Statutes (2007). See Bolden v. State, 4 So.3d 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment but reverse the imposition of the mandatory minimum sentence and remand to the trial court for resentencing.

¶2 AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with instructions.

HAWKES, C.J., LEWIS and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
/16/so3d/229 · .json · Public domain