Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 So. 3d 232

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 19, 2009

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-08-19

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2010

2 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-08-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Appellant has filed an appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record did not indicate any reversible error; therefore, we affirm the convictions and sentences. However, the trial court granted Appellant’s motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), with regard to the amount of jail credit to which Appellant was entitled without entering a corrected written judgment reflecting the new amount of jail credit. Thus, we remand for the trial court to enter a corrected written judgment accordingly.

¶2 AFFIRMED but REMANDED for entry of a corrected written judgment.

BARFIELD, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
/16/so3d/232 · .json · Public domain