Murphy v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · State v. Houghtailing
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court must adjudicate and sentence a defendant convicted of a crime, or in an appropriate case, adjudicate the defendant not guilty due to a lack of sufficient evidence to convict, double jeopardy, or any other legally sufficient reason. The trial court may not simply refuse to act.”). 2 . Covello was held in a jail in another county during trial and was transported between jails on more than one occasion. For security reasons, a photograph was taken of him each time he was transported between jails. 3 . A”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.