16 So. 3d 997 - State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 835 So. 2d 259 - State v. Carter · 678 So. 2d 319 - Boler v. State · 758 So. 2d 110 - State v. Kalogeropolous · 766 So. 2d 1137 - State v. Ortiz · State v. Pasko
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]nly where the most favorable construction to the State would still not establish a prima facie case of guilt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Poillot · State v. Avella“[E]ven if the trial court doubts the sufficiency of the State's evidence, it may not grant a motion to dismiss criminal charges simply because it concludes that the case will not survive a motion for judgment of acquittal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Avella
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.