Larkin v. Koether’s Empirical Analysis
1927
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 1993
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 94 N.J. Eq. 632 - Orange Society of New Jerusalem v. Konski · Orange Society v. Konski · 94 N.J. Eq. 348 - Herring v. Esposito
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““AVhere time is not of the essence, an arbitrary and sudden determination of the transaction cannot be permitted to immediately end pending disputes or negotiations as to title. The other party must be allowed a reasonable length of time in which to perform. An arbitrary notice of termination may be entirely disregarded.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Paradiso v. Mazejy“the precise lot of land for which he contracted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.