Rayford v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 44th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 55 (Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914) · 21 U.S.C. § 360 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360C (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360E (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360J (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)
Relies on Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co. · Cain v. Bain · Gibbs v. General Motors Corporation · Swilley v. Hughes · MJR Corp. v. B & B VENDING CO.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.