Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 TEX 163 - White v. Shepperd

White v. Shepperd’s Empirical Analysis

1856

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
March 1948
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 1948

24 state decisions

801856186018701880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A question has been raised in this case, relative to the power of the husband to dispose of his homestead without his wife’s consent. This restriction applies where the husband has acquired full property in the land, and not where it is charged with preceding equities, or incumbrances. These must be discharged, and they have precedence over the rights of the homestead privilege; and the right of a husband to make arrangeménts in relation to these incumbrances, or to renounce lands thus burdened or subject to conditions and contingencies, could not be questioned by the wife, in virtue of her remote right which might arise if the incumbrances or conditions were ever discharged or removed, unless in cases where the husband is squandering the property, with the fraudulent design of depriving his wife of a homestead. “Another question has been made, with reference to the testamentary power of a husband over his homestead lands, without the consent of his wife; and this can be considered when presented in a case where the husband is attempting to bequeath his own lands, and not, as in this case, where the declarations of the son, in the supposed will, were in relation to lands which were not really his own.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.