Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 U.S. 336 - United States v. Bevans

United States v. Bevans’s Empirical Analysis

16 U.S. 336 · 1818

Citation profile

151
cited by 151 later decisions
28
cited 28 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 23 district · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 151 later decisions (28 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2020 · most notably Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen (1917)

31 federal appellate · 23 district · 27 state decisions — followed in 16 states

2501818182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on the Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon Others · United States v. La Vengeance · The United States v. The Schooner Betsey and Charlotte, and Her Cargo · Pierce Beach

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 151 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That if any person or persons shall, within any fort, arsenal, dockyard, magazine, or in any other place or district of country, under the sole and exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, commit thh crime of willful murder, such person or persons on being thereof convicted shall suffer death.” •”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “upon the high seas or in any river, haven, basin or bay out of the jurisdiction of any particular state,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““The place described is unquestionably within the original territory of Massachusetts. It is, then, within the jurisdiction of Massachusetts, unless that jurisdiction has been ceded to the United States.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.