Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 UTAH 42 - Young v. Clark

Young v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1997

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

2018971900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Railroad Company v. Gladmon · Barry v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. · Roth v. Union Depot Co. · Manistee National Bank v. Seymour · Hooker v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are of the opinion that when the community, situated as this was with reference to the bridge, have for 17 years been accustomed to use the bridge as a footpath, without objection, the company is chargeable with notice of such usage, and owes a duty to use reasonable care to prevent injury to persons that are liable to be crossing the same, even though they do so without authority.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.