16 Utah 2d 316 - Malmstrom v. Olsen’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2011
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Martin v. Stevens · Anderson v. Nixon · Fredrickson v. MAW · Winegar v. Slim Olson, Inc. · Farrah v. Patton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the ordinary lay person could conclude that this violent jerk if it ruptured the cervical dises would be a violation of the chiropractic standards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This is the recognized rule in this state, and applies to chiropractors and others treating human ailments as well as physicians and surgeons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in giving treatments for low back pains in her spine, and thereby rupturing the fifth and sixth cervical dises in her neck.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.