Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Va. App. 113 - Cole v. Commonwealth

16 Va. App. 113 - Cole v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2014

23 state decisions

80199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 7 Va. App. 10 - Blain v. Commonwealth · Eckhart v. Commonwealth · 14 Va. App. 892 - Hall v. Commonwealth · Harmon v. Commonwealth · Sadoski v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A judge, unlike a juror, is uniquely suited by training, experience and judicial discipline to disregard potentially prejudicial comments and to separate, during the mental process of adjudication, the admissible from the inadmissible, even though he has heard both." Eckhart v. Commonwealth, 222 Va. 213, 216 , 279 S.E.2d 155, 157 (1981). Consequently, we presume that a trial judge disregards prejudicial or inadmissible evidence. Hall v. Commonwealth, 14 Va.App. 892, 902 , 421 S.E.2d 455, 462 (1992) ( en banc ). Finally, "this presumption will control in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary." [Id.] . . . This is not to say that the admission of improper evidence in a bench trial may never result in reversible error. Where the record makes clear that the judge considered such inadmissible evidence in adjudicating the merits of the case, reversal would be appropriate.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “volunteer[ing] the name of one of the felonies for which he had been convicted—grand larceny—without being asked to do so by the Commonwealth.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the admission of improper evidence in a bench trial [could] never result in reversible error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.