Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Va. App. 150 - Hamm v. Commonwealth

16 Va. App. 150 - Hamm v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2025

16 state decisions

601993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Amperex Electronic Corp. v. New York Racing Assn., Inc. · Scherl v. Fisher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A conviction cannot be based solely on the uncorroborated statement of a person that a crime has occurred and that he committed it. The corpus delicti cannot be established by a confession of the accused uncorroborated by any other evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If a statement is offered for any purpose other than to prove the truth or falsity of the content of the statement, such as to explain the declarant's conduct or that of the person to whom it was made, it is not objectionable as hearsay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.