¶1This case simply involves a question of costs which has been ignored by the majority opinion. If the appellant was entitled to costs, if the *165litigation had been determined before the object of the proceeding had been accomplished, he is entitled to them now. I concur so far as the dismissal is concerned, but not in the judgment for costs which follows.
16 Wash. 163
Hice v. Orr
Decided December 11, 1896
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1896-12-11
<p>Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.—Hon. John C. Stallcup, Judge.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Appeal dismissed · Decided 1896-12-11
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 1946 · most notably Ward v. Charlton (1941), Moores v. Moores (1899)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →