Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Wash. 2d 399 - Vance v. Ingram

16 Wash. 2d 399 - Vance v. Ingram’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2020

9 state decisions

40194319501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on White v. Mitchell · Corr v. Hoffman · Kavanaugh v. Johnson · Causten v. Barnette · Leavenworth State Bank v. Cashmere Apple Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “court may always consider the surrounding circumstances leading up to the execution of an agreement, not to evidence an intent contrary to that expressed in the agreement, but to place the court in the same position as the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.