Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Wash. App. 292 - State v. Turner

16 Wash. App. 292 - State v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2012

10 state decisions

5019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 84 Wash. 2d 498 - State v. Smith · State Ex Rel. Foster-Wyman Lumber Co. v. Superior Court · 77 Wash. 2d 726 - State v. Tyler · 84 Wash. 2d 90 - State v. Eller · 70 Wash. 2d 591 - State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although a clear line of demarcation cannot always be delineated between what is substantive and what is procedural, the following general guidelines provide a useful framework for analysis. Substantive law prescribes norms for societal conduct and punishments for violations thereof. It thus creates, defines, and regulates primary rights. In contrast, practice and procedure pertain to the essentially mechanical operations of the courts by which substantive law, rights, and remedies are effectuated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The jury may be allowed to separate if the court finds that good reason exists to believe that such would not jeopardize a fair trial. Any motions or proceedings concerning the separation of the jury shall be made out of the presence of the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When the instructions given, considered as a whole, permit a party to argue his theory of the case, then it is not error to refuse other requested instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.