16 Wash. App. 526 - State v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1996
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 9 Wash. App. 260 - State v. Grant · 26 Wash. 2d 405 - State v. Cooper · 1 Wash. App. 152 - State v. Palmer · 9 Wash. App. 691 - State v. Carothers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although Henderson did not directly seek the admission of "[a]ny information obtained in violation of RCW 9.73.030" (RCW 9.73.050), his use of the transcription clearly violated the statute's intended purpose of preventing "encroachment upon the privacy of the parties to a conversation." State v. Grant, 9 Wn. App. 260, 265 , 511 P.2d 1013 (1973).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]ny information obtained in violation of RCW 9.73.030”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.