16 Wash. App. 543 - Chambers v. Cranston’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2008
1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 75 Wash. 2d 456 - Kendrick v. Davis · 70 Wash. 2d 915 - Sigman v. Stevens-Norton, Inc. · 76 Wash. 2d 220 - John R. Hansen, Inc. v. Pacific International Corp. · 26 Wash. 2d 246 - Dill v. Zielke · 54 Wash. 2d 161 - Nelson v. Bailey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the purchaser has mortgaged his interest, the mortgagee is entitled to notice of forfeiture if the seller knows of the mortgagee, and the mortgagee has the right to tender payments to the seller necessary to protect his security, i.e., to keep the contract in effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[F]orfeitures are not favored in law and are never enforced in equity unless the right thereto is so clear as to permit of no denial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Equity seeks fairly to protect all parties who act fairly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.