Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Wash. App. 632 - State v. Parker

16 Wash. App. 632 - State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
6
states following
September 1989
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Campbell v. Superior Court · City of Westerville v. Cunningham · 264 Cal. App. 2d 788 - Bush v. Bright · 13 Wash. App. 591 - Welch v. Department of Motor Vehicles · State v. Severson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “had the statute intended evidentiary use of the right of refusal, it is logical that the arresting officer would be required to inform him that his refusal could be used as evidence in a criminal proceeding as well as the consequential loss of the privilege to drive. Since the statute does not require such warning, we conclude that the legislation did not contemplate the additional consequence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We have grave doubts of the probative value of refusal evidence where defendant is exercising a right granted by statute. Inasmuch as there is such a statutory right of refusal, we hold that the State may not use such evidence in a criminal proceeding as establishing an inference of guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.