Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Wash. App. 648 - State v. Durham

16 Wash. App. 648 - State v. Durham’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 1982
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · North Carolina v. Alford · McCarthy v. United States · Henderson v. Morgan · Halliday v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'who is in the position of pleading voluntarily with an understanding of the nature of the charge but without realizing that his conduct does not actually fall within the charge.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the trial judge must make direct inquiries of the defendant as to whether he understands the nature of the charge and the full consequences of a guilty plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.