Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 WIS2D 369 - Kopke v. Ranney

Kopke v. Ranney’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
October 2005
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently October 2005 · most notably 17 Cal. 3d 465 - Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior Court (1976), Eidelson v. Archer (1982)

22 state decisions

12019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of America · Bauer v. Samson Lodge · St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Thompson · Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Green · Wax v. International Mailers Union

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The doctrinal declaration that courts will not intervene in internal union disputes until all appeals within the union have been exhausted has, in theory, three underlying policies. First, union appellate tribunals may take corrective action, thus reducing the burden on the courts. Second, the benefit of the expert judgment of these tribunals might aid courts in making more-responsible decisions. Third, the deep and pervading principle of preserving the autonomy of unions constrains courts to give the union full responsibility and opportunity to correct its own mistakes.’ ” Kopke, supra, page 373.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.