Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 Ariz. 235 - State v. Flores

State v. Flores’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably State v. Womack (1992), State v. Siddle (2002)

2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

1801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · State v. Robinson · State v. Sweet · State v. Pena · State v. Rivera

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Sexual intercourse" means penetration into the penis, vulva, or anus by any part of the body or by any object or manual masturbatory contact with the penis or vulva. (emphasis added).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The purpose of this section [public indecency] is to protect the public from shocking and embarrassing displays of sexual activities. A person need not be in a public place to be a member of the public. The ambit of protection afforded by this statute clearly extends to members of the public in their own homes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “J.D. Todd[ ] intentionally and knowingly engaged in an act of sexual intercourse, to wit: manual masturbatory contact with his penis, and was reckless that [victim's name], an Indian, a child under the age of fifteen years, was present....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.