State v. Prince’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably State v. Lavers (1991), State v. Wood (1994)
1 federal appellate · 41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Scharffe v. Perkins · Jizmejian v. United States · Sullivan v. United States · Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Ogilvie · California Department of Transportation v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendant’s final evidentiary argument is that the court made a series of erroneous rulings, which, taken together, constitute “cumulative error.” We have never recognized a “cumulative error” theory and decline to do so now. Instead, we evaluate each of defendant’s claimed errors and determine if it, independently, requires reversal. See State v. Fleming, 117 Ariz. 122, 128 , 571 P.2d 268, 274 (1977) (cited with approval in State v. Johnson, 122 Ariz. 260, 274 , 594 P.2d 514, 528 (1979)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.