Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 Ariz. 98 - Baker v. Gardner

Baker v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
2
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

8 district · 73 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp. (1991), Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc. (1992)

8 district · 73 state decisions

38019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrison v. Olson · 59 Cal. 2d 35 - Roseleaf Corp. v. Chierighino · 15 Cal. 3d 590 - Cornelison v. Kornbluth · 41 Cal. 2d 193 - Brown v. Jensen · 7 Cal. 3d 603 - Spangler v. Memel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If trust property of two and one-half acres or less which is limited to and utilized for either a single one-family or a single two-family dwelling is sold pursuant to the trustee’s power of sale, no action may be maintained to recover any difference between the amount obtained by sale and the amount of the indebtedness and any interest, costs and expenses.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]f a mortgage is given to secure the payment of the balance of the purchase price, or to secure a loan to pay all or part of the purchase price, of a parcel of real property of two and one-half acres or less which is limited to and utilized for either a single one-family or single two-family dwelling, the lien of judgment in an action to foreclose such mortgage shall not extend to any other property of the judgment debtor, nor may general execution be issued against the judgment debtor to enforce such judgment, and if the proceeds of the mortgaged real property sold under special execution are insufficient to satisfy the judgment, the judgment may not otherwise be satisfied out of other property of the judgment debtor, notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[1] Where the creditor chooses non-judicial foreclosure, he cannot obtain a deficiency judgment if the collateral is within the class protected by the deed of trust anti-deficiency statute. [2] Where, however, the creditor chooses judicial foreclosure, he can obtain a deficiency judgment in all cases except those involving purchase money loans on the type of real property that the mortgage foreclosure statute describes. [3] Therefore, where the creditor can obtain a deficiency judgment he can also elect to waive the security under A.R.S. § 33-722 and sue on the note.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.