Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 B.R. 269 - In Re Rubin

In Re Rubin’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
October 2014
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably Schimmelpenninck v. Byrne (1999), Koken v. Reliance Group Holdings, Inc. (In Re Reliance Group Holdings, Inc.) (2002)

160199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 304 · 11 U.S.C. § 507 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 704 · 15 U.S.C. § 1011 (§ 1 of the McCarran-Ferguson Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1012 (§ 2 of the McCarran-Ferguson Act)

Relies on United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n · Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc. · Ingraham v. Wright · Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co. · Cryts v. French

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1)enjoin the commencement or continuation of— (A) any action against— (i) a debtor with respect to property involved in such foreign proceeding; or (ii) such property; or (B) the enforcement of any judgment against the debtor with respect to such property, or any act or the commencement or continuation of any judicial proceeding to create or enforce a lien against the property of such estate; (2) order turnover of the property of such estate, or the proceeds of such property, to such foreign representative; or (3) order other appropriate relief.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) The business of insurance, and every person engaged therein, shall be subject to the laws of the several States which relate to the regulation or taxation of such business. (b) No Act of Congress shall be construed to invalidate, impair, or supersede any law enacted by any State for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance, or which imposes a fee or tax upon such business, unless such Act specifically relates to the business of insurance ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “To allow [the creditor's] claim to be tried in the United States now would threaten the just treatment of all holders of claims because the estate has inadequate resources to engage in a trial without threatening the [curators'] efforts to maximize the estate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.