In Re Baumgardner’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2010
1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Velis v. Kardanis · In the Matter of Richard L. Kochell, Debtor-Appellant · American Honda Finance Corp. v. Cilek (In Re Cilek) · Matter of Velis · In Re Sheridan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) Debtor’s present and anticipated living expenses; 2) Debtor’s present and anticipated income from all sources; 3) Age of the debtor and dependants; 4) Health of the debtor and dependants; 5) Debtor’s ability to work and earn a living; 6) Debtor’s job skills, training, and education; 7) Debtor’s other assets, including exempt assets; 8) Liquidity of other assets; 9) Debtor’s ability to save for retirement; 10) Special needs of the debtor and depen-dants; 11) Debtor’s financial obligations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Cluckey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.