In Re Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2016
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1327
Relies on Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · Delaware v. New York · Sanders Confectionery Products Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc. · Bennett v. Gemmill · In re Szostek
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This court did not have jurisdiction to enter an order the effect of which would be to divest the appellate court from rendering a decision on the merits of the pending appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Russo v. Seidler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.