Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 CALAPP3D 46 - People v. Caddick

People v. Caddick’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2017

18 state decisions

801984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 8 Cal. 3d 410 - In Re Lynch · 26 Cal. 3d 498 - People v. Sage · 25 Cal. 3d 223 - People v. Saffell · 7 Cal. 3d 639 - In Re Minnis · 14 Cal. 3d 189 - People v. Romo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`prison inmates are conclusively guilty and presumptively in need of rehabilitation.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the terms prison inmates and pretrial detainees are more than labels which define the difference between persons who have been convicted of a felony and sentenced and those who have simply been charged with [a] felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “( People v. Romo (1975) 14 Cal.3d 189, 196 [ 121 Cal. Rptr. 111 , 534 P.2d 1015 ].)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.