Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 CONN 378 - State v. Mortoro

State v. Mortoro’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2011

20 state decisions

8019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 47 U.S.C. § 605

Relies on Katz v. United States · Hoffa v. United States · Lopez v. United States · Lewis v. United States · On Lee v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he testimony of several individuals was introduced at trial regarding the Rose shooting. The portion of the testimony relevant to the crimes for which the defendant was on trial was simply that which would prove that he had at some time owned a gun that produces shell casings that match the one found on Hopkins' collar. It would have been sufficient for the state simply to introduce evidence to that effect without going into the details of the defendant's involvement with the [Rose shooting].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “it would have been quite sufficient for the state to have offered only the portion of the recording relating to the conversation concerning narcotics”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.