Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

160 F. 1022

Docket No. 702.

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1908.)

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1908-05-28

<p>Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina at Raleigh.</p>

1 counsel of record

Relies on Mitchell v. Mitchell

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1908-05-28

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina at Raleigh.

¶2James H. Pou and P. S. Winston (Pou & Fuller and Winston & Mathews, on the briefs), for appellant. Murray Allen (Day & Bell and J. B. Martin, on the briefs), for ap-pellee.

¶3Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and WADDILL and MeDOWELL, District Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The learned judge of the lower court, in determining this ease, filed a full and comprehensive opinion, which will be found in 147 Fed. 280. The conclusions reached in that opinion, after careful examination of the record by us, are approved, and the judgment of the court affirmed.

/160/f1d/1022 · .json · Public domain