Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 F.1d 171 - In re Gilpin

In re Gilpin’s Empirical Analysis

160 F. 171 · 1908

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 1932
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1932

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

301908191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co. · United States v. Isham · In re Dresser & Co. · In re Louisville Nat. Banking Co. · Freyer v. McCord

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The other matter that may properly need a moment’s consideration is the effect that should be given to the word ‘false’ in clause 3. In my opinion the argument for the bankrupt must rest wholly upon the conclusion that this word should bear. It is unquestionably a flexible word. Sometimes it means incorrect, or not true; sometimes it includes the idea of wickedness or fraud — as in section 29, where a false oath is evidently a corruptly false oath, such as would subject the affiant to a prosecution for perjury. That ‘false’ means no more in clause 3 than ‘not true,’ I have tried to establish in the preceding pages of this opinion, and if I have failed hitherto to give good reasons to my belief I am sure that I shall not strengthen the argument by stating them again in somewhat different words. “The decision of the referee is reversed and the eelrlc is directed to entelan order sustaining the first objection of the Merchants’ National Bank to the bankrupt’s discharge.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““I accept and shall act upon the finding of the referee that the bankrupt either did not actually know what the statement contained, or did not know that it was materially false, and that ho did not have a conscious intention to deceive the bank.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.