Reader v. Haggin’s Empirical Analysis
160 F. 909 · 1908
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1930
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Denison v. Shawmut Mining Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * This court has repeatedly held that after the expiration of ihe term at which the cause was tried, unless the court reserves control over the case by rule or order, it is too late to allow a bill of exceptions. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.