McCarthy v. M & M Transp. Co.’s Empirical Analysis
160 F.2d 322 · 1947
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2002
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp. · Kay v. General Cable Corp. · Western & Southern Life Ins. v. Huwe · McCarthy v. M & M Transp. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“who is inducted into the Armed Forces of the United States ... for training and service and who leaves a position (other than a temporary position) in the employ of any employer in order to perform [military] training and service”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Trulson v. Trane Co.“defeat the intent of the statute by discharging a man because he is going into the Armed Forces,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Trulson v. Trane Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.