Freeman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
160 F.2d 72 · 1947
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1964
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Lefkowitz · Davis v. United States · Zap v. United States · Cudahy Packing Co. v. Holland · Bowles v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where the'production is in response to lawful process, the owner of the books and papers is afforded protection by. the limitation which the law imposes with respect to lawful process.” Freeman v. United States, 9 Cir., 1947, 160 F.2d 72, 75 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.