Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 F.2d 787 - Murrell v. Western Union Tel. Co.

Murrell v. Western Union Tel. Co.’s Empirical Analysis

160 F.2d 787 · 1947

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
November 2009
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2009

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

401947195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 601 · 47 U.S.C. § 8

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The United States Code was not enacted' as a statute,, nor can it be construed as such. It is only a prima facie statement of the statute law. The statutes collected in it. did not change their meaning nor acquire any new force ■by their inclusion. If construction is necessary, recourse must ;be had to the original statutes themselves.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.