Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 F.3d 149 - United States v. Grillo

United States v. Grillo’s Empirical Analysis

160 F.3d 149 · 1998

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
August 2016
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2016

8 federal appellate ·

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1920 · 5 U.S.C. § 8101 (Attendant Allowance Adjustment Act)

Relies on Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Alaska v. United States · Capital Communications Federal Credit Union v. Boodrow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whoever knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up a material fact, or makes a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, or makes or uses a false statement or report knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry in connection with the application for or receipt of compensation or other benefit or payment ... shall be guilty of perjury, and on conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine under this title, or by imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both; but if the amount of the benefits falsely obtained does not exceed $1,000, such person shall be punished by a fine under this title, or by imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.