Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 F.3d 567 - Lopez v. Smith

Lopez v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

160 F.3d 567 · 1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
February 2001
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Farmer v. Brennan · Parratt v. Taylor · Daniels v. Williams · Sandin v. Conner · Warren III v. City of Carlsbad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall dismiss " required district courts to dismiss without leave to amend any in forma pauperis complaint that failed to state a claim for relief. The panel maintained that this reading of the statute was consistent with Congress's desire to "reduce docket pressure on federal courts caused by a burgeoning prisoner-litigant caseload.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an opportunity to amend the complaint to overcome the deficiency unless it clearly appears from the complaint that the deficiency cannot be overcome by amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if the court determines that . . . the action or appeal . . . fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.