Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 160 F.3d 578 - Nasca v. Peoplesoft

Nasca v. Peoplesoft’s Empirical Analysis

160 F.3d 578 · 1998

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
June 2014
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably Wilhelm v. Rotman (2012), Irwin v. Mascott (2004)

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

160199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc. · Calderon v. Waco Lighthouse for the Blind · Alaniz v. California Processors, Inc. · Archie v. Christian · Jaliwala v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our insistence that consent be explicit, clear and unambiguous is not an exercise in mere formalism. But for the consent requirement, § 636(c)'s grant of judicial power to magistrates would infringe on the constitutional rights guaranteed to litigants by Article III.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “lack of jurisdiction a fortiori deprives this court of appellate jurisdiction”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unless a party requests reassignment timely, the parties will be deemed to have consented to the trial and disposition of this case by the assigned United States Magistrate Judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.