Coates v. Sundor Brands, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
160 F.3d 688 · 1998
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Monge v. California · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth · Henson v. City of Dundee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) (quoted in Meritor Sav. Bank, FSB v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 , 67, 106 S.Ct. 2399, 2405, 91 L.Ed.2d 49 (1986)). When an employee's ability to perform his or her job is compromised by discriminatory acts including sexual harassment and the employer knows it, it is the employer that has the ability, and therefore the responsibility, to address the problem, whether the harasser is a supervisor, a co-worker, a client, or a subordinate. See Vance v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 863 F.2d 1503 , 1515 (11th Cir.1989) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] tangible employment action constitutes a significant change in employment status, such as hiring, firing, failing to promote, reassignment with significantly different responsibilities, or a decision causing a significant change in benefits”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“about both the problem and the actions that will be taken should complaints about sexual harassment arise. Sanders Dep., Ex. 3 at 24. In addition, the company's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.