Fournier v. Reardon’s Empirical Analysis
160 F.3d 754 · 1998
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2018
6 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Graham v. Connor · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Monroe v. Pape · United States v. Mendenhall · Daniels v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment only if, in view of all of the circumstances surrounding the incident, a 7 reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Substantive due process ... imposes limits on what a state may do regardless of what procedural protection is provided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Due process claims may take either of two forms: procedural due process or substantive due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.