Tutrone v. Shaughnessy’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 1993
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1009 · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan · Barber v. Gonzales · Tillinghast v. Edmead · United States ex rel. Guarino v. Uhl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not arising out of a single scheme of criminal misconduct”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wood v. Hoy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.